
By Barbara Wunder, FFVA communications manager
(Updated
5-17-2010)
From the peril and frustration of another legislative session in
Tallahassee, Florida
farmers seemed to emerge in positive territory. It was a good
session for the agriculture industry up until Gov. Charlie
Crist picked up his veto pen May 15.
“If there is one word to describe the 2010 Florida legislative
session as a whole, it would be ‘drama’,” said
Butch Calhoun, FFVA’s
director of government relations.
|
FFVA's Butch Calhoun with Rep. Denise Grimsley, R-Sebring, sponsor
of HB 981, which, in part, would reverse a bad Greenbelt court
ruling.
|
FFVA began its work this session by focusing on three priority bills
that it worked to help pass and several bills that it had targeted for
defeat. One priority was passage of the Tomato Food Safety Bill (SB
350), which requires minimum food safety standards for producing,
harvesting, packing and repacking of Florida-grown tomatoes. The bill
passed on April 15 and later was signed by Gov. Charlie Crist.
The bill was the final piece of legislative action needed to complete
the tomato food safety program, said Reggie Brown, head of the Florida
Tomato Committee. “It will enable the state to inspect farms and
require annual food safety training to ensure that we continue to
produce the safest product we know how to produce,” Brown said.
The measure had been included unsuccessfully in past sessions’
agriculture bills. “We ran it separately this year so that we
could do our best to ensure passage,” said Brown.
Another priority was passage of the Agriculture Industry Bill (HB
7103). The bill sought to limit the growing number of local
government regulations that duplicate state regulations for agricultural
landowners. Although passed by the House, Gov. Crist vetoed the measure
saying, "I have concerns about the restrictions placed on local
governments that are contained in this bill. There is not an adequate
justification for the state to interject its authority over local
decision making." Crist's veto letter dated May 15 goes on to say that
while state regulation is sometimes necessary to provide certainty,
uniformity and stability on certain policy issues, it should be applied
sparingly. "This bill attempt to apply a remedy without sufficiently
identifying a problem," it concludes.
FFVA’s third priority, a clarification of the Florida greenbelt
law (HB 981), also fell to the veto pen. The measure would have
clarified the law after a circuit court case involving an agricultural
landowner who continued to grow timber on property after listing it for
sale. The property appraiser denied assessment on the parcel. The
clarification states that “land classified as bona-fide
agricultural land retains that classification when offered for sale if
the land continues to be used primarily for bona-fide agricultural
purposes.” In vetoing this bill, Gov. Crist said, "I have concerns
about making it easier for developers to take advantage of program
intended to protect Florida farmers from facing financial pressures to
sell their land. Rather than benefitting farmers as the greenbelt
provisions are intended, this bill could cubsidize private real estate
speculation at the expense of the taxpayer."
|
"Please take the time to write, email or call your legislator
soon to say thank you.”
- Butch Calhoun, FFVA Director, Government
Relations
|
On the flip side, one of the bills FFVA opposed was
legislation that would have deleted the requirement that water
management district governing boards delegate their authority to approve
permits to the executive director. Others FFVA worked to defeat
would have exempted food producers, packagers or processors who sell
directly to the consumer from food safety regulations, and two others
dealt were immigration-related measures that would have negatively
impacted farm operations.
Calhoun gives credit to the efforts of those in the agriculture
industry. “Legislators heard from them that these issues were
important,” he said. “Now it is as important that they show
them how much they appreciate the legislators who supported our
priorities. Calhoun encouraged FFVA members to write, e-mail or call
their legislator to say thank you.
To learn more about individual bills, FFVA producer members may
access this session’s government affairs bulletins in the publications section of
ffva.com.
Bulletins were also mailed each Friday to all producer members
during the session. If you missed any and would like to receive a hard
copy, just send a request via e-mail or call Barbara Wunder at (321)
214-5207.